data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106f9/106f9a7f4f722c08c8c45d966ac68e978c05bc84" alt=""
This got me to thinking though... the arguments for barefoot training being pro-foot-muscle frequently have to do with the nerves and touch receptors (or whatever you want to call them) in the bottom of the foot reacting to the things you are stepping on and then triggering a muscle response to pull that portion of your tender little footsie away from the sharp rock. I wonder if, while running in my VFFs, I've strengthened my toes and ankles, but not gotten as much benefit in the foot because the sole of the VFFs dampen a lot of the sharp pointy things that I step on. Walking on gravel in VFFs is DEFINITELY more pleasant than in true bare feet. I think I see another experiment in which to use myself as a guinea pig!
Part of this all is that I am a scientist. The concepts and theories behind the arguments pro-bare feet make sense to me in physical and biomechanical sense. I really want some solid evidence to back it up though. I'd like to have a before and after to support my statements of "I believe this to be better for my body." Guess I'm off to go play in some gravel without shoes.... tomorrow... or the next day. Today I just want to run through the woods with abandon again. : )
2 comments:
So, guess who talked Erwan into letting me join the already full MovNat Clinic in Seattle on Sept. 27th? :-)
It sounds like in 6 hrs I'll learn the philosophy of MovNat, and then learn drills to improve my "perception of fundamental natural movement principles." Followed by "essentials techniques." What ever that really means. :-O
I'm really pumped about it either way!
I'm having entertaining thoughts of Erwan finding a foutain in the middle of the park and getting you guys to swim while pushing a log across it. : )
Post a Comment